On Choice

Warning: The following post may be disagreeable to some. It might conflict with previously believed dogma, and it might offend. That's not my purpose in writing this though. I'm simply trying to capture in words what I've been led to believe in my quest to grow closer to God. Even if it is disagreeable, I hope that your reading this will challenge and strengthen your faith in the greatness of God.

Warning #2: This post is long and to be read in multiple sittings if needed.

Lately, the concept of predestination has been weighing heavily on my heart and mind. I've talked with some of my Christ-loving peers about it a little, but I can't seem to come to peace with the idea of an assured destiny. So, I'm writing my own personal thoughts on the subject. I welcome responses, comments and discussion. And, I pray that my writing this will not stir up dissension but will instead point to God's glory.

First, it's important to know my current understanding of the Calvinist idea of predestination. For reference, I recommend listening to an sermon by C. H. Spurgeon entitled "Non Nobis, Domine!" which is accessible here. The following is a transcription of the piece of his sermon that is of interest:

According to some men, it seems that salvation is mainly the work of the ceature. Christ died for him, but Christ may have died in vain unless he, by something that he does, makes Christ's death effectual. That kind of teaching, I do not believe because it throws the onus of redemption, after all, upon man and makes him to give efficacy to the redemption of Christ. Neigh, verily... But I believe that those for whom Christ gave Himself as a ransom price shall surely be His forever. And that He did really redeem them and needeth not that they add anything to make that everlasting ransom price sufficient and available for their deliverance. There are some who seem to think that the sinner takes certain steps towards God before God comes to him, but it is not so. The sinner is dead. And life must come to him from God, ere he can stir from the grave or even have a wish to stir there from. And there are some who teach that after a man is saved, he still needs to keep himself and confirm himself in grace in fact that his salvation depends upon himself... But it is not so. For He who has called us and has saved us has given us gifts which are without repentance which He will never take back. And having once loved us, He will love us to the end. We are firmly persuaded that He who has begun a good work in us will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ. From top to bottom, salvation is all of the grace of God. (C. H. Spurgeon, Non, Nobis Domine!)

For the most part, I agree with what Spurgeon is saying. But, the bold points (which form his basis of belief) I do not agree with. Allow me to explain why.

• In Spugeon's saying, "those for whom Christ gave Himself as a ransom price shall surely be His forever," there is an underlying assumption that Christ did NOT give Himself for everyone. For, by this logic, everyone would then be saved. This I cannot accept. For, while I was dead in sin along with everyone else who didn't or doesn't follow Christ, there was nothing that should've intrinsically separated me from everyone else. For God to choose me above another would be an unmistakable example of partiality. I'll address this more completely later.

• "[A]nd needeth not that they add anything", in respect to salvation is particularly disagreeable to me. Here, Spurgeon is referring to a person's profession of faith and acceptance of Jesus Christ as Savior. He implies that, by stating an acceptance, the sinner is somehow validating God's grace. That is simply not the case. God's grace needs no validation. The fact is, without Jesus, none of us would have any way to ensure that a covering shroud of grace surrounded us. Redemption was made accessible by Christ's death and resurrection. But, as God is the God of love (which requires a choice), we are given the option of refusing to accept that grace. While the sinner is not adding anything to the salvation, acceptance is necessary. Or else, what does one make of Romans 10:9? This acceptance requires repentance on the sinner's part. For, what is the difference between one who says the words, then lives in sin compared to one who just lives in sin?

It appears to me that Spurgeon and I disagree on these matters, and probably those that are about to be covered.

Vital to my understanding is this: God loves us all equally. And, by "us all" I mean everybody. There is not a thing that a person can do to elevate himself above others. For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus [Romans 3:23-24]. God demonstrates His love for us in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us [Romans 5:8]. For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whosoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have everlasting life [John 3:16].

So, God loves us all equally. We are all sinners, and, Jesus died for everyone. Spurgeon would disagree with me here insisting that, since the sinner is dead in sin and even his desire to be saved is inaccessible, he will not believe until after God has awakened his spirit through redemption. I would then ask Spurgeon what he makes of Romans 2:11 which says, "For there is no partiality with God [NASB]". Or, if he prefers different translations:

• NIV - For God does not show favoritism.
  
• Amplified Bible - For God shows no partiality [undue favor or unfairness; with Him one man is not different from another].
  
• King James - For there is no respect of persons with God.
  
• New Century Version - For God judges all people in the same way.
  

If God is impartial, not a respecter of persons, and without favorites, then Jesus must have died for all. There is simply no other option. Either God is partial and Romans 2:11 is not true (which would make God a liar too since 2 Timothy 3:16 says that all Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine...) or else Jesus died on the cross to redeem the entire world, not just a select few.

It's obvious though that not everyone follows Christ. This seems to imply that action is required on the part of the sinner. For, if action was not required, then our automatic redemption through Jesus would provide us with no ability to choose and would make us into human robots. Make no mistake here, I'm not claiming that choice is necessary for redemption. Were God to take that choice away, we robots would still be redeemed through Christ's death and resurrection. However, the choice is necessary for it to be a loving redemption. For, love can not be forced. The downside of this loving redemption is that not all people will choose to accept it.

This choice complicates the predestination argument. For, if God knows ultimately whether we will choose or reject Him, then Jesus wouldn't have needed to die for everybody. He could have died only for those He knows will choose Him. Because of this, and because there is no Biblical evidence stating the contrary, I believe that God chooses not to know. For, if God knows our choices, then freedom is merely a concept describing an illusory idea. Why does freedom disappear if God knows our choices? It begins with the end.

Our decisions are affected by our previous decisions. That's how life works. There's a journeyness to it. So, our final decision to accept or reject Christ's gracious gift of redemption is affected by all of our previous choices. It's no great mental leap then to claim that, if God knows our ultimate choice, He must also know those leading to it. And, the choices leading up, the choices made in the accessible present, not some elusive future, are the ones that complicate things. See, if God knows all of your choices, and if only truth can be known, then you've virtually already made them. That means, however you decide to live (if predestination is true) can have no different effect on your future. For, some future version of you already decided to make the decisions that you're about to make and was either saved or not because of it (or regardless of it depending on your interpretation). Likewise, another person's interactions with you (or lack thereof) were already weighed by your future mind in order to have already made the decisions you'll make.

"What are you taking so long to say, Curtis?"

I'm trying to say this:

If predestination is true, then every person is living on a pre-specified single life path. There is no hope for change in the sense that we know it today (some of us, I mean). For, a seeming difference in a life's direction merely moves one further along the path God already knew about and judged.

If that is the way that God is unlimited by time , you cannot ever positively affect another's life. There are just no alternate possibilities for comparison... no "could-have-been"s.

In my experience, living according to truth yields positive results. If God knows all of my choices before my present self has made them, then I could keep to myself until I die. Or I could go blow some city up. It wouldn't matter, because "those for whom Christ gave Himself as a ransom price shall surely be His forever." And, if Christ didn't die for me, then I was already destined for hell to begin with.

However, if God chooses not to know our choices infinitely ahead of time, then indeed we can change lives for the glory of God. In that case, if it were possible to directly affect others, it would make sense for Jesus to say, "go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you." [Matthew 28:19]

Now you might be thinking as some of my peers have, "Aren't you limiting God to being inside time with that argument?" No, I'm not. Here's why:

But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance. [2 Peter 3:8-9]

God is still not limited by time. But, He chooses to occasionally operate within its limits for the same reason He operates in space. We are limited by it. And, here's the kicker, He loves us. That makes me smile every time. Still, his time scale isn't linear. That makes Him awesome.

"That's cool, Curtis, but what about Jeremiah 29:11?"

For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.

"How could God know what to plan without knowing our choices beforehand?"

That's a great question. Here's what I think:

There are these books called "Choose Your Own Adventure" that are made for preteens mostly. They don't read like normal books. When you're reading one, you'll eventually get to a page that says:

• If you push the shiny red button, turn to page X.
• If you exit the room, turn to page Y.

I always leave a numbered sticky note at that choice so that I can go back later when, after many more choices, my hero dies from some unforeseen danger or comes out on top. That's what I think life is like. I figure that God, being omniscient, is able to foresee every possible outcome to every choice in an infinity of possibilities. He doesn't use stickies. He just knows what could happen. And, if you're wise enough to ask for it or if you just get lucky, God will help influence your life for His glory which is always better. Though in one sense history has already been written, we get to choose how the story goes. I believe that this power of influence is what defines our being made in His image [Genesis 1:26].

I also think that God can at any moment see which path we will take based on our heart's condition [1 Samuel 16:7], which is determined totally by those things we allow ourselves to be influenced by. So, when I pray, "Lord, please help me conduct myself with meekness and love during the meeting," God looks at all the possible paths created by potential choices, and His Holy Spirit leads me along the right one.

Choice requires potential, love requires choice, and God loves us all. Therefore, He must be allowing each of us the potential to change our futures. For, He would not have created one with no potential to love Him. God is love. Whoever lives in love lives in God, and God in him. [1 John 4:16]

Now, let's take a second to figure out how God is glorified by all of this:

If we were predestined due to Christ's only dying for those He selected be first knowing their choices, if that was the case, then we'd really just be acting out a grand play give God glory. God could always depend on us to make the decisions He knew we'd make. This play would be His expression of love for us while we would be powerless to really express our love to Him. For, without choice, love is an illusion.

But if we're not predestined, then we are free agents choosing what to be influenced by and how to react. That makes us the most unreliable subjects ever. How great our God must be to have His will and be glorified in spite of our shortcomings! Also, if our choices are our own, then we really can have an effect on the lives of others. Therefore, it's important to live according to the will of the God we serve.

Though I could say more, I feel like this part of the thought is complete. I welcome comments and challenges.